mercredi 28 janvier 2026

The little boy who grew up to be the Scorecard serial killer

by

 

The Little Boy Who Grew Up to Be the Scorecard Serial Killer

When people finally learned his name, they were disappointed.

They had expected something sharper. Something cinematic. A name that sounded like evil itself.

Instead, it was ordinary. Almost gentle.

The kind of name you’d find scribbled in crayon on a kindergarten cubby or stitched onto a backpack with a cartoon dinosaur. The kind of name that belonged to a boy who once cried when his goldfish died and who hated the taste of cough syrup.

No one looks at a little boy and sees a serial killer.

That’s the problem.

1. The First Score

The first time he kept score, he was seven years old.

It wasn’t for anything violent. It wasn’t even intentional. His third-grade teacher had taped a chart to the classroom wall—gold stars for good behavior, red circles for disruptions. At the end of the week, the child with the most stars won a prize.

Most kids just wanted the prize.

He wanted the system.

He studied the chart obsessively. He noticed patterns. Which kids were forgiven. Which ones were punished for the same behavior. How rules bent depending on who was watching.

When another boy shoved him during recess and the teacher scolded him instead, something clicked into place.

That night, he went home and drew his own chart.

Names on the left. Columns across the top.

Good. Bad. Fair. Unfair.

He didn’t know it yet, but this was the beginning of the scorecard.

2. A Quiet House with Loud Rules

He grew up in a house that valued order above all else.

His father believed discipline built character. His mother believed silence kept the peace. Arguments were not loud, but they were constant—sharp whispers behind closed doors, resentment hanging in the air like humidity.

Mistakes were not forgiven. They were documented.

A spilled drink meant a lecture. A bad grade meant disappointment that lingered for weeks. Apologies were irrelevant; only correction mattered.

He learned early that love was conditional.

So he adapted.

He followed rules perfectly. He learned how to disappear when emotions ran high. He learned that if you couldn’t escape judgment, you could at least understand it.


And understanding meant control.

3. Watching, Not Participating

Other kids played.

He watched.

He noticed who cheated during games and who got away with it. He noticed which teachers humiliated students and which protected favorites. He noticed cruelty disguised as humor, bullying excused as “kids being kids.”

When a classmate stole lunch money from smaller kids, everyone laughed it off.

When a shy girl finally snapped and yelled back, she was sent to the principal.

The math never added up.

So he started keeping track.

Not on paper anymore. In his head.

A running tally of wrongs and who committed them.

A mental ledger that never forgot.

4. The First Fracture

The summer he turned twelve, the family dog died.

The dog had been old, sick, and gentle. His only true friend in the house. The one creature that loved him without conditions or scorekeeping.

When his father took the dog to be “put down,” he didn’t come back for hours.

Later, the boy overheard the truth.

The dog hadn’t been sick enough. The vet had suggested waiting. His father had insisted.

“He was becoming inconvenient,” his father said.

That word lodged itself deep in the boy’s mind.

Inconvenient.

That night, for the first time, the scorecard gained a new column.

Irredeemable.

5. Learning the World’s Math

Teenage years sharpened him.

He learned how power actually worked—not through rules, but through fear, charisma, and silence. He watched predators thrive in plain sight. Teachers who crossed lines. Coaches who humiliated kids “to toughen them up.”

No one did anything.

The world wasn’t broken, he realized.

It was functioning exactly as designed.

So he adapted again.

He learned how to blend in. How to laugh at the right jokes. How to seem harmless. He learned how to make people comfortable enough to be careless.

And all the while, the scorecard grew.

6. The Philosophy of Balance

In college, he studied statistics.

Not because he loved math—but because it explained people.

Outliers. Patterns. Deviations. Correction.

He wrote essays about moral accountability disguised as academic theory. Professors praised his insight without realizing how literal his thinking had become.

He wasn’t angry.

That’s what people never understood.

He was methodical.

To him, violence wasn’t emotional. It was corrective.

The world kept letting certain people tip the scales.

Someone had to balance them.

7. The First Correction

The first person he killed would never be named publicly.

The police would call it a mugging gone wrong.

But he knew better.

The man had been on his scorecard for years—a local figure with a reputation that never quite turned into consequences. Rumors. Settlements. Smiles that never reached the eyes.

He didn’t feel pleasure when it happened.

He felt relief.

Like fixing a crooked picture frame.

That night, he updated the scorecard for the first time in years.

One mark erased.

Balance restored.

8. The Ritual Emerges

After that, the scorecard became physical again.

A notebook. Plain. Unremarkable.

Each page followed the same structure:

Name

Public Face

Private Record

Victims

Attempts at Correction (Failed)

Final Score

He didn’t rush.

He believed haste was how innocent people got hurt.

He researched obsessively. He waited. He confirmed patterns.

And when the score was undeniable—when the math proved someone had taken more than they’d ever give back—he acted.

No randomness.

No collateral damage.

Just correction.

9. The Media Gets It Wrong

The press loved a nickname.

The Scorecard Serial Killer.

They imagined a madman obsessed with numbers. A deranged genius leaving clues behind. A monster driven by compulsion.

They were wrong.

He didn’t want attention. He didn’t leave messages. The scorecard was for him alone.

The name stuck because investigators found one page after a raid on an abandoned apartment—a page he hadn’t meant to lose.

One page was enough to turn him into a myth.

And myths are easier to hate than truths.

10. Almost Human

There were moments—rare, unsettling moments—when he doubted himself.

A woman on the list who laughed nervously when confronted by allegations. A man who had done terrible things once but seemed genuinely changed.

He paused.

He recalculated.

Sometimes, he crossed names out.

That was his mercy.

The world never noticed.

11. The Boy Still Inside

In quieter moments, he thought about the little boy he used to be.

The one with the gold-star chart. The one who wanted rules to mean something. The one who believed fairness was possible if everyone just followed the system.

He wondered if that boy would recognize him.

He decided the boy would understand.

Someone had to finish the accounting.

12. The Beginning of the End

They caught him because he made one mistake.

Not emotional. Not violent.

Human.

He spared someone he shouldn’t have.

That person talked.

Patterns connected.

The math unraveled.

When police finally entered his apartment, they found no trophies. No weapons on display. No walls covered in madness.

Just shelves of notebooks.

Orderly.

Precise.

Balanced.

13. Trial by Numbers

In court, experts debated his sanity.

Was he delusional? Psychopathic? A moral absolutist taken too far?

He didn’t argue.

He didn’t confess.

He simply listened as his life was reduced to numbers—victim counts, dates, statistics.

Irony wasn’t lost on him.

The world loved scorecards too.

14. The Final Entry

They never found the last notebook.

Authorities assumed it was destroyed.

They were wrong.

On death row, in the quiet hours before sleep, he kept it in his head.

One final scorecard.

The system.

The institutions.

The silence.

And himself.

For the first time, his own name appeared on the list.

Final score pending.

15. Epilogue: What We Miss

People still ask the wrong question.

They ask how a serial killer is made.

They ask what went wrong.

They rarely ask who kept the score first.

The truth is uncomfortable.

The little boy didn’t grow up wanting to kill.

He grew up wanting fairness.

And when the world taught him fairness was optional—enforceable only by power—he learned to become powerful in the only way he understood.

That doesn’t excuse him.

But it explains him.

And explanations are far more frightening than monsters.

How many holes are there on this shirt?

by

 


How many holes are there on this shirt?

 

**How Many Holes Are There on This Shirt?
A Simple Question That Tricks the Brain**

At first glance, the question seems almost childish: *How many holes are there on this shirt?* It sounds like something you’d hear in a classroom full of bored students or see attached to a viral image on social media. Yet this deceptively simple question has confused millions of people, sparked heated comment-section debates, and revealed something fascinating about how our minds work.

This isn’t really a question about shirts. It’s a question about perception, assumptions, and the shortcuts our brains take every day.

So let’s slow down, look carefully, and unravel why such a basic puzzle continues to trip people up—and what it teaches us about thinking more clearly.

## The Viral Shirt Puzzle Explained

You’ve probably seen the image: a simple illustration or photo of a shirt, often with several visible rips or cut-out holes. The caption asks:

**“How many holes are there on this shirt?”**

People rush to answer. Some say four. Others say six. Some insist it’s eight. A few confidently declare that *everyone else is wrong*.

And that’s where the fun begins.

The correct answer depends on whether you’re actually *counting*—or just reacting. 


Our brains are designed to be efficient, not perfect. When we see a familiar object like a shirt, we don’t analyze it from scratch. We rely on mental shortcuts called **heuristics**.

Instead of asking, *“What constitutes a hole?”*, the brain often asks, *“What looks unusual here?”*

So we count the obvious tears or cutouts—and forget the basics.

This is where most people go wrong.

## Step One: Defining What a “Hole” Is

Before counting anything, we need to agree on a definition.

A **hole** is:

> An opening that goes all the way through an object, from one side to the other.

That definition matters more than you might think.

Decorations, outlines, shadows, or printed shapes don’t count. Neither do folds or wrinkles. Only actual openings qualify.

Step Two: The Holes Everyone Forgets

dimanche 25 janvier 2026

The Hidden Language of Color: What Your Favorite Shades Say About You

by

 

 

The Hidden Language of Color: What Your Favorite Shades Say About You

Different colors tend to create different impressions. Red, for example, is associated with boldness, energy, and determination. It can inspire confidence and motivation, which is why many people are drawn to it when they want a boost of enthusiasm. At the same time, frequent attraction to red may suggest a need for stimulation or a desire to feel more empowered. Blue works in almost the opposite way. It is widely connected to calmness, clarity, and trust. Many people choose blue when seeking peace or moments of quiet reflection. However, gravitating toward blue might also express a wish for emotional balance or a sense of stability during stressful times. Purple adds another layer of meaning, often symbolizing creativity, introspection, and transformation. People may feel drawn to purple during periods of personal growth or when naviga

ting important life transitions.

Our brains react instantly to color, and this influence goes beyond personal taste. Lightness, darkness, and saturation all play a role in shaping how we feel. Even cultural backgrounds add depth to these interpretations. A color considered joyful in one region may represent mourning in another, reminding us that color meanings are both personal and collective. This is why the shades we choose for our clothing, homes, and workspaces matter. Soft greens might create a sense of balance, deep blues may encourage focus, and warm oranges can inspire comfort. These choices can shift throughout our lives, especially during significant changes such as moving to a new place, starting a new job, or entering a new chapter.

Interestingly, the colors we avoid can also reveal something meaningful. Steering clear of bright shades might indicate a desire for simplicity or calm, while avoiding pale tones could reflect a need for grounding or emotional warmth. Whether we embrace certain hues or distance ourselves from them, color remains a subtle guide that helps us understand our inner landscape. The next time you find yourself drawn to a particular shade—perhaps while choosing an outfit, decorating a room, or admiring something in nature—take a moment to notice what it brings out in you. Color often expresses emotions long before we are fully aware of them, offering gentle insight into how we feel and what we need.